Kernel flaws and buffer overflows

Topics covered

  • Kernel flaws

  • Buffer overflows

Kernel flaws

The kernel is a critical component of an operating system (OS) and a prime target for exploitation. Here’s why kernel flaws are significant in penetration testing:

1. What is the Kernel?

The kernel is the core part of an OS, responsible for managing:

  • Memory, processes, and CPU scheduling

  • Hardware interactions (drivers)

  • Security enforcement (access controls, permissions)

  • System calls (interface between user applications and hardware)

Since the kernel operates at the highest privilege level (Ring 0 in x86 architecture), any flaw can lead to full system compromise.

2. Why Are Kernel Flaws a Penetration Testing Category?

NIST SP 800-115 includes kernel flaws as an attack category because:

  • Privilege Escalation: Exploiting a kernel vulnerability (e.g., buffer overflow, race condition, or memory corruption) can allow an attacker to gain root/admin access from an unprivileged user.

  • Persistence: Malware/rootkits often target the kernel to hide their presence and maintain long-term access.

  • Bypassing Security Mechanisms: Many security controls (SELinux, AppArmor, firewalls) rely on the kernel. If the kernel is compromised, these protections can be disabled.

  • Widespread Impact: A single kernel flaw can affect all applications and services running on the system.

3. Common Kernel Exploits in Pen Testing

Penetration testers look for vulnerabilities such as:

  • Unpatched Kernel Versions (CVE-listed vulnerabilities like Dirty Pipe, Dirty COW)

  • Driver Vulnerabilities (Third-party drivers often have weak security)

  • Use-After-Free (UAF) & Buffer Overflows (Memory corruption flaws)

  • Race Conditions (Time-of-check to time-of-use - TOCTOU)

  • Integer Overflows (Leading to memory corruption)

4. How Pen Testers Exploit Kernel Flaws

  • Identifying Vulnerable Kernels (Using tools like uname -a, Linux Exploit Suggester).

  • Crafting/Using Public Exploits (From exploit databases like Exploit-DB).

  • Testing Local Privilege Escalation (LPE) (Gaining root from a low-privilege shell).

  • Testing Kernel Module Vulnerabilities (Loading malicious modules).

5. Mitigation & Best Practices

  • Regular Patching (Applying kernel security updates).

  • Minimizing Kernel Attack Surface (Disabling unnecessary modules).

  • Using Security Mechanisms (Grsecurity, SELinux, Kernel Address Space Layout Randomization - KASLR).

  • Monitoring Kernel Activity (Auditd, intrusion detection systems).

Conclusion

Kernel flaws are a critical category in penetration testing because they offer a direct path to complete system takeover. NIST SP 800-115 emphasizes testing kernel security to ensure robust defenses against such high-impact attacks. Pen testers must assess kernel vulnerabilities to help organizations mitigate risks before malicious attackers exploit them.

Buffer overflows

Buffer overflows represent a critical security vulnerability. A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data into a buffer (a temporary storage area in memory) than it can hold, causing the excess data to overflow into adjacent memory spaces. This can corrupt data, crash the program, or—most dangerously—allow attackers to execute arbitrary code and take control of a system.

How Buffer Overflows Work

1. Memory Basics

  • A buffer is a fixed-size block of memory used to store data (e.g., user input).

  • Programs rely on bounds checking to ensure data fits within the buffer.

  • If this check fails, overflow occurs, overwriting adjacent memory.

2. Types of Buffer Overflows

Type
Description

Stack Overflow

Overflows a buffer in the stack (where function calls & local variables are stored).

Heap Overflow

Overflows a buffer in the heap (dynamically allocated memory).

Integer Overflow

Arithmetic operation exceeds max value, leading to unexpected behavior.

Why Are Buffer Overflows Dangerous?

When exploited, buffer overflows can: ✔ Corrupt data → Crash the program (Denial of Service). ✔ Overwrite function return addresses → Redirect execution to attacker-controlled code. ✔ Execute shellcode → Run malicious commands (e.g., open a reverse shell).

How Attackers Exploit Buffer Overflows

Step 1: Identify a Vulnerable Program

  • Target software with poor input validation (e.g., old C/C++ programs, network services).

  • Common vulnerable functions:

    • strcpy(), strcat(), gets() (no bounds checking).

    • scanf(), sprintf() (improper formatting).

Step 2: Craft Malicious Input

  • Send overly long input to overflow the buffer.

  • Example (simple stack overflow):

    c

    char buffer[10];  // Buffer can only hold 10 bytes
gets(buffer);     // If user enters 20+ bytes, overflow occurs

Step 3: Overwrite the Return Address

  • The stack stores:

    • Local variables (e.g., buffer[10]).

    • Return address (where the program should resume after a function call).

  • By overflowing the buffer, an attacker can overwrite the return address to point to malicious code.

Step 4: Inject & Execute Shellcode

  • Attacker inserts shellcode (malicious machine code) into the buffer.

  • The overwritten return address points to this shellcode.

  • When the function returns, the shellcode executes (e.g., spawning a shell).

Real-World Buffer Overflow Exploits

Exploit
Impact

Morris Worm (1988)

First major worm exploiting a buffer overflow in fingerd.

Code Red (2001)

Exploited a buffer overflow in Microsoft IIS, infected 350K+ servers.

Blaster Worm (2003)

Exploited a buffer overflow in Windows RPC, causing system crashes.

Heartbleed (2014)

Read sensitive memory due to missing bounds checks in OpenSSL.

How to Prevent Buffer Overflow Attacks?

✅ Use Safe Programming Practices

  • Avoid unsafe functions (strcpy, gets) → Use strncpy, fgets.

  • Enable compiler protections (e.g., -fstack-protector in GCC).

✅ Enable Memory Protections

  • DEP (Data Execution Prevention) – Prevents code execution in stack/heap.

  • ASLR (Address Space Layout Randomization) – Randomizes memory layout.

  • Stack Canaries – Detects overflow before return address is corrupted.

✅ Regularly Patch Software

  • Many exploits target unpatched systems (e.g., EternalBlue).

✅ Use Modern Languages

  • Languages like Rust, Java, Python manage memory automatically.

Example of a Simple Buffer Overflow Exploit

c

#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>

void vulnerable_function(char *input) {
    char buffer[10];
    strcpy(buffer, input);  // No bounds checking → Overflow possible
}

int main() {
    char exploit[30] = "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA\xef\xbe\xad\xde";
    vulnerable_function(exploit);  // Overwrites return address with 0xdeadbeef
    return 0;
}

  • If exploit is too long, it overwrites the return address (0xdeadbeef in hex).

  • An attacker could replace 0xdeadbeef with shellcode address.

Conclusion

Buffer overflows remain a critical security risk, especially in low-level software. Attackers exploit them to hijack program execution, leading to remote code execution, privilege escalation, or system crashes. Proper secure coding, memory protections, and patching are essential to mitigate these attacks.

PreviousMisconfigured security settingsNextSetting up a cybersecurity lab

Last updated